Showing posts with label induction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label induction. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Inequality Induction

Induction is an untouched topic in this blog so far, but I finally found a good question about it. It's not hard, but it's rather challenging.

Prove by induction:
(1 * 3 * 5 * 7 * ... * (2n - 1)) / (1 * 2 * 3 * 4 * ... * n) < 2n/√(2n + 1)

The first step in proving an induction is checking whether it works at all. Let's plug 1 for n:
1 / 1 < 21/√(2 + 1)
1 / 1 < 2 / √3 - correct!

Assume that the inequality is correct for n = k (k is natural)
(1 * 3 * 5 * ... * (2k - 1)) / (1 * 2 * 3 * ... * k) < 2k/√(2k + 1)

Now let's prove that if the inequality is right for n = k, it is right for n = k + 1:
(1 * 3 * 5 * ... * (2k - 1) * (2k + 1)) / (1 * 2 * 3 * ... * k * (k + 1)) < 2k + 1/√(2k + 3)

First, we know that (1 * 3 * 5 * ... * (2k - 1)) / (1 * 2 * 3 * ... * k) is smaller than 2k/√(2k + 1), so it's definitely smaller than 2k + 1/√(2k + 3). For this reason, we can place 2k/√(2k + 1) instead of this big expression:
(2k * (2k + 1))/(k + 1)√(2k + 1) < 2k + 1/√(2k + 3)

Divide by 2k:
(2k + 1)/(k + 1)√(2k + 1) < 2 / √(2k + 3)

Square both sides and cross multiply (k is natural, all positive):
4k2 + 8k + 3 < 4k2 + 8k + 3
3 < 4 - always true

We have shown that if n = k is correct, n = k + 1 is also correct. By checking that n = 1 is correct, we have proven that the inequality is correct for all natural numbers.

Enjoy,
Nadav

nadavs